4.5 Article

Locomotor compensation in the sea: body size affects escape gait in parrotfish

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages 1109-1116

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.08.005

Keywords

body size; coral reef fish; cospecialization; escape response; flight initiation distance; gait; locomotion; Scaridae; swimming mode

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There has been surprisingly little attention to adaptive variation in the locomotor speed and gaits used in antipredator behaviour. We investigated the relationship between body size and the use of two alternative gaits by three species of parrotfishes (princess, Scarus taeniopterus; queen, Scarus vetula; stoplight, Sparisoma viride) escaping an approaching snorkeller in their natural fringing reef habitat in Barbados. As body size increased from about 7 to 58 cm, the proportion of fish using an energetically more costly but relatively faster escape (body and caudal fin swimming) rather than a less costly and relatively slower escape (paired fin swimming) decreased from 100% to 0%. In contrast, the study confirmed previous research showing that larger fish fled at greater distances from the snorkellers, behaviour which would have increased safety but incurred higher opportunity costs. We conclude that small fish require a more expensive gait to attain an adequate escape speed. Thus, the gait used for escaping shows a compensatory relationship with body size because small individuals with lower swimming capacity use a higher proportion of that capacity. On the other hand, flight initiation distance shows cospecialization with body size because larger fish with higher swimming capacity further reduce their risk by fleeing sooner. (C) 2011 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available