4.6 Article

Identification of genes selectively regulated by IFNs in endothelial cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue 2, Pages 1122-1135

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.2.1122

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IFNs are highly pleiotropic cytokines also endowed with marked antiangiogenic activity. In this study, the mRNA expression profiles of endothelial cells (EC) exposed in vitro to IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, or IFN-gamma were determined. We found that in HUVEC as well as in other EC types 175 genes were up-regulated (> 2-fold increase) by IFNs, including genes involved in the host response to RNA viruses, inflammation, and apoptosis. Interestingly, 41 genes showed a > 5-fold higher induction by IFN-alpha in EC compared with human fibroblasts; among them, the gene encoding the angiostatic chemokine CXCL11 was selectively induced by IFN-a in EC along with other genes associated with angiogenesis regulation, including CXCL1O, TRAIL, and guanylate-binding protein 1. These transcriptional changes were confirmed and extended by quantitative PCR analysis and ELISA; whereas IFN-alpha and IFN-beta exerted virtually identical effects on transcriptome modulation, a differential gene regulation by type I and type II IFN emerged, especially as far as quantitative aspects were concerned. In vivo, IFN-alpha-producing tumors overexpressed murine CXCL10 and CXCL11, guanylate-binding protein 1, and TRAIL, with evidence of CXCL11 production by tumor-associated EC. Overall, these findings improve our understanding of the antiangiogenic effects of IFNs by showing that these cytokines trigger an antiangiogenic transcriptional program in EC. Moreover, we suggest that quantitative differences in the magnitude of the transcriptional activation of IFN-responsive genes could form the basis for cell-specific transcriptional signatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available