4.7 Article

Amygdala reactivity and mood-congruent memory in individuals at risk for depressive relapse

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 231-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.004

Keywords

depression; risk/vulnerability; mood; memory; amygdala; fMRI

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00827] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH59259, 5 F31-MH064997] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: According to cognitive diathesis-stress theories, a latent cognitive vulnerability to depression is activated by negative affect in individuals at risk for depressive relapse. This vulnerability call manifest as mood-congruent memory during sad mood and may involve amygdala response, which is implicated in memory for emotionally arousing stimuli. This study examined whether amygdala modulates memory for negatively valenced words before and after a sad mood induction in healthy individuals with and without a history of recurrent major depression. Methods: Fourteen unmedicated remitted depressed (RD) and 14 matched never depressed (ATD) individuals were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing a self-referent encoding/evaluation task (SRET) preceding and following a sad mood challenge. After each SRET participants 'free recall was assessed. Results: Following sad mood induction, bilateral amygdala response during encoding of valenced words predicted increased recall of negative self-referent wordsfora subset of RD participants. This association was not present before the sad mood induction and was not evident in individuals without a history of depression, regardless of mood state. Conclusions. These results are consistent with cognitive diathesis-stress theories and suggest a role for the amygdala in modulating mood-congruent memory during transient sad mood in individuals who are vulnerable to depression relapse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available