4.6 Article

Risk factors for umbilical cord infection among newborns of Southern Nepal

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 2, Pages 203-211

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj356

Keywords

infant; newborn; infection; Nepal; risk factors; umbilical cord

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD038753, R01 HD044004-03, R01 HD038753-04, HD44004, HD38753, R01 HD044004] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although umbilical cord infection contributes to neonatal mortality and morbidity and risk can be reduced with topical chlorhexidine, behavioral or other factors associated with cord infection in low-resource settings have not been examined. Data on potential risk factors for omphalitis were collected during a community-based, umbilical cord care trial in Nepal during 2002-2005. Newborns were evaluated in the home for signs of umbilical cord infection (pus, redness, and swelling). Omphalitis was defined as either pus discharge with erythema of the abdominal skin or severe redness (> 2 cm extension from the cord stump) with or without pus. Multivariable regression modeling was used to examine associations between omphalitis and maternal, newborn, and household variables. Omphalitis was identified in 954 of 17,198 newborns (5.5%). Infection risk was 29% and 62% higher in infants receiving topical cord applications of mustard oil and other potentially unclean substances, respectively. Skin-to-skin contact (relative risk (RR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43, 0.95) and hand washing by birth attendants (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.84) and caretakers (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.95) were associated with fewer infections. In this community, unhygienic newborn-care practices lead to continued high risk for omphalitis. In addition to topical antiseptics, simple, low-cost interventions such as hand washing, skin-to-skin contact, and avoiding unclean cord applications should be promoted by community-based health workers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available