4.5 Article

Long-term safety and tolerability of long-acting injectable risperidone in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

Journal

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 138-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.08.004

Keywords

schizophrenia; schizoaffective disorder; long-acting injectable risperidone; effects; long-term

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Subjects were patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder enrolled in extension studies (Study A and Study B) after participating in 12-week studies of long-acting injectable risperidone [Kane, J.M., Eerdekens, M., Lindenmayer, J.-P., Keith, S.J., Lesem, M., Karcher, K., 2003. Long-acting injectable risperidone: efficacy and safety of the first tong-acting atypical antipsychotic. Am. J. Psychiatry 160, 1125-1132; Lindenmayer, J.-P, Eerdekens, L., Berry, S., Eerdekens, M., 2004. Safety and efficacy of tong-acting risperidone in schizophrenia: a 12-week, multicenter, open-label study in stable patients switched from typical and atypical oral antipsychotics. J. Clin. Psychiatry 65, 1084-1089]. Twelve months of treatment were completed by 55% of Study A patients and 52% of Study B patients. The median modal dose of tong-acting injectable risperidone was 50 mg/14 days in both studies. Most frequent adverse events were psychosis, headache, insomnia, agitation, and rhinitis. EPS-related adverse events were reported in 33% of patients in Study A and 22% in Study B. Patients with Clinical Global Impressions ratings of not ill and mild increased from 14% at baseline to 54% at endpoint in Study A and from 42% to 65% in Study B. It is concluded that treatment with tong-acting injectable risperidone for I year or longer appeared to be safe and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available