4.6 Article

Alteration of the migratory behavior of UV-induced regulatory T cells by tissue-specific dendritic cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue 2, Pages 877-886

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.2.877

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UV radiation-induced regulatory T cells (UV-Treg) inhibit the sensitization but not the elicitation of contact hypersensitivity when injected i.v. Because UV-Treg express the lymph node homing receptor CD62 ligand, upon i.v. injection they migrate into the lymph nodes but not into the periphery and therefore inhibit sensitization but not elicitation. We tried to modify the migratory behavior of UV-Treg with the aim to get them into the periphery and thereby to suppress the effector phase of immune reactions. Because the tissue selective homing of T effector cells is determined by tissue-specific dendritic cells (DC), we attempted to reprogram the migratory behavior of UV-Treg by DC. 2,4-Dinitrofluorobencene (DNFB)-specific UV-Treg coincubated with epidermal Langerhans cells (LC) blocked the elicitation upon i.v. injection into DNFB-sensitized mice. In contrast, i.v. injection of UV-Treg not incubated with LC did not inhibit the ear challenge. The same negative effect was observed for UV-Treg coincubated with DC from bone marrow, spleen, or lymph nodes. This effect was not due to different maturation stages as checked by MHC class II expression of the different DC types. Incubation with LC but not with bone marrow-derived DC down-regulated the expression of CD62 ligand on UV-Treg. Accordingly, CFDA-SE labeled UV-Treg coincubated with LC were found in the ears but not in the lymph nodes upon i.v. injection. This finding shows that the migratory behavior can be reprogrammed by tissue-specific DC and may have input on strategies trying to use Treg not only for the prevention but also for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available