4.7 Article

Understanding seismic heterogeneities in the lower mantle beneath the Americas from seismic tomography and plate tectonic history

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 112, Issue B1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2005JB004154

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] We combine results from seismic tomography and plate motion history to investigate slabs of subducted lithosphere in the lower mantle beneath the Americas. Using broadband waveform cross correlation, we measured 37,000 differential P and S traveltimes, 2000 PcP-P and ScS-S times along a wide corridor from Alaska to South America. We invert the data simultaneously to obtain P and S wave velocity models. We interpret slab structures and unravel subduction history by comparing our V-S tomographic images with reconstructed plate motion from present-day up to 120 Myr. Convergence of the Pacific with respect to the Americas is computed using either (1) the Pacific and Indo-Atlantic hot spot reference frames or (2) the plate circuit passing through Antarctica. Around 800 km depth, four distinctive fast anomalies can be associated with subduction of the Nazca, Cocos, and Juan de Fuca plates beneath South, Central, and North America, respectively, and of the Pacific plate beneath the Aleutian island arc. The large fast anomalies in the lowermost mantle, which are most pronounced in the S wave models, can be associated with Late Cretaceous subduction of the Farallon plate beneath the Americas. Near 2000 km depth, the images record the post-80 Myr fragmentation of the proto-Farallon plate into the Kula plate in the north and the Farallon plate in the northeast. Near 1000 km depth, we infer separate fast anomalies interpreted as the Kula-Pacific, Juan de Fuca, and Farallon slabs. This interpretation is consistent with the volume and length of slabs estimated from the tomographic images and the plate history reconstruction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available