4.7 Article

Testing X-ray measurements of galaxy clusters with cosmological simulations

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 655, Issue 1, Pages 98-108

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/509868

Keywords

cosmology : theory; galaxies : formation; methods : numerical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

X-ray observations of galaxy clusters potentially provide powerful cosmological probes if systematics due to our incomplete knowledge of the ICM physics is understood and controlled. In this paper we present mock Chandra analyses of cosmological cluster simulations and assess X-ray measurements of galaxy cluster properties using a model and procedure essentially identical to that used in real data analysis. We show that reconstruction of three-dimensional ICM density and temperature profiles is excellent for relaxed clusters, but still reasonably accurate for unrelaxed systems. The total ICM mass is measured quite accurately (less than or similar to 6%) in all clusters, while the hydrostatic estimate of the gravitationally bound mass is biased low by about 5% -20% through the virial region, primarily due to additional pressure support provided by subsonic bulk motions in the ICM, ubiquitous in our simulations even in relaxed systems. Gas fraction determinations are therefore biased high; the bias increases toward cluster outskirts and depends sensitively on its dynamical state, but we do not observe significant trends of the bias with cluster mass or redshift. We also find that different average ICM temperatures, such as the X-ray spectroscopic T-spec and gas-mass-weighted T-mg, are related to each other by a constant factor with a relatively small object-to-object scatter and no systematic trend with mass, redshift, or the dynamical state of clusters. We briefly discuss direct applications of our results for different cluster-based cosmological tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available