4.7 Article

Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: Evidence from the ultimatum game

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 951-956

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4606-06.2007

Keywords

decision making; emotion; human; lesion; neuroeconomics; orbitofrontal; prefrontal; ventromedial

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA022549-02, R01 DA022549] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [P01 NS19632, P01 NS019632] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emotion regulation is often critical for adaptive decision making. Here, we investigate whether emotion regulation defects following focal prefrontal brain damage are associated with exceptionally irrational economic decision making in situations of unfair treatment. In the Ultimatum Game, two players are given one opportunity to split a sum of money. One player (the proposer) offers a portion of the money to the second player (the responder) and keeps the rest. The responder can either accept the offer (in which case both players split the money as proposed) or reject the offer (in which case both players get nothing). Relatively low Ultimatum offers are often rejected, and this irrational behavior has been attributed to an emotional reaction to unfair treatment. Using the lesion method, we tested the hypothesis that damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPC), an area critical for the modulation of emotional reactions, would result in exaggerated irrational economic decisions. Subjects acted as the responder to 22 different proposers who offered various splits of $10. Offers ranged from fair (give $5, keep $5) to extremely unfair (give $1, keep $9). The rejection rate of the VMPC group was higher than the rejection rates of the comparison groups for each of the most unfair offers ($7/$3, $8/$2, $9/$1). These results suggest that emotion regulation processes subserved by VMPC are a critical component of normal economic decision making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available