4.6 Article

Activation in extended amygdala corresponds to altered hedonic processing during protracted morphine withdrawal

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 176, Issue 2, Pages 251-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.10.012

Keywords

morphine dependence; conditioned place preference; extended amydala; opiate withdrawal; food conditioning; amygdala

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R37 DA006214, R01 DA006214, R01 DA017289, DA-017289, DA-06214] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previously we reported that during protracted morphine abstinence rats show reduced conditioned place preferences (CPP) for food-associated environments, compared to non-dependent subjects. To determine the brain regions involved in this altered reward behavior, we examined neural activation (as indexed by Fos-like proteins) induced by a preference test for a food-associated environment in 5-week morphine-abstinent versus non-dependent animals. The results indicate that elevated Fos expression in the anterior cingulate cortex (Cg) and basolateral amygdata (BLA) correlated positively with preference behavior in all groups. In contrast, Fos expression in stress-associated brain areas, including the ventral lateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (VL-BNST), central nucleus of the amygdala (CE), and noradrenergic (A2) neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NITS) was significantly elevated only in morphine-abstinent animals. Furthermore, the number of Fos positive neurons in these areas was found to correlate negatively with food preference in abstinent animals. These results indicate that the altered hedonic processing during protracted morphine withdrawal leading to decreased preference for cues associated with natural rewards may involve heightened activity in stress-related brain areas of the extended amygdala and their medullary noradrenergic inputs. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available