4.7 Article

Role of the progesterone receptor for paclitaxel resistance in primary breast cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 241-247

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603538

Keywords

paclitaxel; chemosensitivity; primary tumour cells; individualized chemotherapy; progesterone receptor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Paclitaxel plays an important role in the treatment of primary breast cancer. However, a substantial proportion of patients treated with paclitaxel does not appear to derive any benefit from this therapy. We performed a prospective study using tumour cells isolated from 50 primary breast carcinomas. Sensitivity of primary tumour cells to paclitaxel was determined in a clinically relevant range of concentrations (0.85-27.2 mu g ml(-1) paclitaxel) using an ATP assay. Chemosensitivity data were used to study a possible association with immunohistochemically determined oestrogen and progesterone receptor ( ER and PR) status, as well as histopathological parameters. Progesterone receptor ( PR) mRNA expression was also determined by quantitative RT-PCR. We observed a clear association of the PR status with chemosensitivity to paclitaxel. Higher levels of immunohistochemically detected PR expression correlated with decreased chemosensitivity (P = 0.008). Similarly, high levels of PR mRNA expression were associated with decreased paclitaxel chemosensitivity (P = 0.007). Cells from carcinomas with T-stages 3 and 4 were less sensitive compared to stages 1 and 2 (P = 0.013). Multiple regression analysis identified PR receptor status and T-stage as independent predictors of paclitaxel chemosensitivity, whereas the ER, N-stage, grading and age were not influential. In conclusion, in vitro sensitivity to paclitaxel was higher for PR-negative compared with PR-positive breast carcinoma cells. Thus, PR status should be considered as a possible factor of influence when designing new trials and chemotherapy protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available