4.8 Article

Connecting nitrogenase intermediates with the kinetic scheme for N2 reduction by a relaxation protocol and identification of the N2 binding state

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610975104

Keywords

intermediate; kinetic isotope effect

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL13531, R01 HL013531] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01-GM59087, R01 GM059087] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A major obstacle to understanding the reduction of N-2 to NH3 by nitrogenase has been the impossibility of synchronizing electron delivery to the MoFe protein for generation of specific enzymatic intermediates. When an intermediate is trapped without synchronous electron delivery, the number of electrons, n, it has accumulated is unknown. Consequently, the intermediate is untethered from kinetic schemes for reduction, which are indexed by n. We show that a trapped intermediate itself provides a synchronously prepared initial state, and its relaxation to the resting state at 253 K, conditions that prevent electron delivery to MoFe protein, can be analyzed to reveal n and the nature of the relaxation reactions. The approach is applied to the H+/H- intermediate (A) that appears during turnover both in the presence and absence of N2 substrate. A exhibits an S = 1/2 EPR signal from the active-site iron-molybdenum cofactor (FeMo-co) to which are bound at least two hydrides/protons. A undergoes two-step relaxation to the resting state (C): A -> B -> C, where B has an S = 3/2 FeMo-co. Both steps show large solvent kinetic isotope effects: KIE approximate to 3-4 (85% D2O). In the context of the Lowe-Thorneley kinetic scheme for N-2 reduction, these results provide powerful evidence that H-2 is formed in both relaxation steps, that A is the catalytically central state that is activated for N-2 binding by the accumulation of n = 4 electrons, and that B has accumulated n = 2 electrons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available