4.5 Article

Group size and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in Kalahari meerkats

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 689-700

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.015

Keywords

breeding success; cooperative breeding; fitness; meerkat; reproductive skew; Suricata suricatta

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C511348/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In animal societies, contrasts in reproductive skew among females are caused by variation in the frequency of reproduction by subordinates. However, despite widespread interest in the extent and causes of reproductive skew, few empirical studies have investigated the factors affecting the frequency of successful reproduction by subordinates. We tested the prediction that the extent to which dominants restrict the reproductive success of subordinates should increase as group size rises and the marginal benefits of additional helpers falls. In a long-term study of wild meerkats, Suricata suricatta, we found that dominants were more likely to evict subordinates in large groups than small ones, and that the frequency of breeding by subordinate females declined with group size, largely as a result of increases in abortion rate. The breeding frequency of subordinate females was also influenced by their age and weight, which probably reflects the capability of subordinates to breed and their ability to resist the attempts of dominants to suppress them. These findings highlight the importance of investigating variation in the benefits to dominants of controlling subordinate reproduction as well as variation in the benefits of breeding to subordinate females when attempting to understand variation in subordinate breeding success. (C) 2008 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available