4.6 Article

Mass and thermal balance during composting of a poultry manure - Wood shavings mixture at different aeration rates

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 215-223

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.08.005

Keywords

thermal balance; composting; aeration rates; convection; conductive heat loss; radiant energy loss

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Composting is an exothermic process often controlled on the basis of temperature feedback, but for which the energetics of the overall system are generally not well known. In this study, the thermal balance of a poultry manure and wood shavings mixture was estimated during composting at different aeration rates. The study was conducted using 900-1 vertical cylindrical reactors at high-flow (0.39-0.52 L/min ka VS) and low-flow (0.07-0.2 L/min kg VS) aeration rates. The actual amount of evaporated water from the high-flow reactor was 37-60% more than from the low-flow reactor in trials 1 and 2. The energy generated from degrading 1 g of VS of the poultry manure and wood shavings mixture was 16.83-19.7 kJ/g VS. The high-flow reactors showed more VS reduction, generating 22-29% more energy than low-flow reactors. The heat loss via forced convection was 52-54% of the total energy produced in the high-flow reactors, but just 17-21% in the low-flow reactors, where natural convection appeared to also play a significant role. The conductive heat loss from the low-flow reactors was greater than from the high-flow reactors, ranging from 44 to 53% in trials 1 and 2. The radiant energy loss was higher in the low-flow reactors, but in all cases was only 5% or less of the total energy loss. Because the reactor scale and configuration will affect these thermal losses, analysis of process energetics should be a fundamental part of system design. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available