Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 169-173Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.10.009
Keywords
intervention; musculoskeletal disorders; epidenuology
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
As ergonomics has grown and expanded, one area of research and practice that has become more prominent is that dealing with musculoskeletal disorders. For various reasons, the increased scrutiny on the effectiveness of ergonomics for preventing musculoskeletal disorders has led to a recent boom in intervention effectiveness research. Although this has considerable intuitive appeal, several reasons why some intervention research can he detrimental to the field are outlined. The fact that many situations will load to statistical insignificance or weak evidence has implications for creating a negative bias in the literature. The myriad barriers to intervention research often lead to murky answers to the omnibus hypothesis that an intervention is effective, whereas an alternative, of showing productivity gains instead of decreased morbidity, increases the risk that interventions become ergonomic pitfalls if the productivity gains result in increased throughput rates.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available