4.5 Article

Determinants of disease presentation and outcome during cryptococcosis:: The CryptoA/D study

Journal

PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 297-308

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040021

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Cryptococcosis is a life-threatening opportunistic fungal infection in both HIV-positive and-negative patients. Information on clinical presentation and therapeutic guidelines, derived mostly from clinical trials performed before introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with cryptococcal meningoencephalitis, is missing data on extrameningeal involvement and infections by serotype D as opposed to serotype A of Cryptococcus neoformans. Methods and Findings The prospective multicenter study CryptoA/D was designed in France (1997-2001) to analyse the factors influencing clinical presentation and outcome without the bias of inclusion into therapeutic trials. Of the 230 patients enrolled, 177 (77%) were HIV-positive, 50 (22%) were female, and 161 (72.5%) were infected with serotype A. Based on culture results at baseline, cryptococcosis was more severe in men, in HIV-positive patients, and in patients infected with serotype A. Factors independently associated with mycological failure at week 2 independent of HIV status were initial dissemination (OR, 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-4.9]), high (> 1:512) serum antigen titre (OR, 2.6 [1.3-5.4]), and lack of flucytosine during induction therapy (OR, 3.8 [1.9-7.8]). The three-month survival was shorter in patients with abnormal neurology or brain imaging at baseline, and in those with haematological malignancy. Conclusions Thus sex, HIV status, and infecting serotype are major determinants of presentation and outcome during cryptococcosis. We propose a modification of current guidelines for the initial management of cryptococcosis based on systematic fungal burden evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available