4.5 Article

Dysfunction in multiple primary afferent fiber subtypes revealed by quantitative sensory testing in patients with chronic vincristine-induced pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 166-179

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.08.006

Keywords

cancer; chemotherapy; hyperalgesia; human

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39933] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vincristine is one of the frontline chemotherapy drugs for the treatment of numerous lymphoid neoplasias. The main dose-limiting complication of vincristine is the development of painful peripheral neuropathy. Although, clinical reports have appeared in the literature detailing the symptoms of vincristine neuropathy quantitative sensory testing data that might yield insight to dysfunction in subsets of primary afferents are lacking. In. this report, pain descriptors and anatomical distributions of sensory abnormalities were collected in each patient. Touch detection threshold, sharpness detection threshold, the thresholds for the detection of skin warming, heat pain, skin cooling, and the perception of cooling-induced pain were measured in patients with chronic vincristine-induced pain in each area of sensory abnormality and in skin perceived as outside the affected areas. Elevated touch detection thresholds were observed both within and outside areas affecred by pain and sensory abnormality. Elevated sharpness and warm detection thresholds were noted only in areas affected by pain. These data suggest that chronic vincristine-induced pain is associated with ferent fibers. Deficits in A beta fibers appear to dysfunction in A beta, A delta, and C caliber primary qf precede and presage deficits in the other fiber types, whereas deficits in A delta- and C-fiber function appear to be specifically associated with the generation of pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available