4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Rapid, real-time detection of acute HIV infection in patients in Africa

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 195, Issue 3, Pages 416-424

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/510755

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [ST32 AI07701-29, 5 U19 AI031496, 5 P30 AI50410, K23 AI01781] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R37 DK49381] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH68686] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate methods of detecting clients with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) who were acutely coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Lilongwe, Malawi. Methods. After informed consent was obtained, all clients with acute STDs were offered voluntary HIV counseling and testing by 2 rapid antibody tests. Samples from rapid test-negative or -discordant subjects were pooled (50: 5: 1) and tested for HIV RNA. Western blots were performed on all rapid test-discordant specimens with detectable HIV RNA. A subset of specimens received p24 antigen testing with standard and/or ultrasensitive methods. Patients with possible acute HIV infection were followed to confirm seroconversion. Results. A total of 1450 clients (34% female and 66% male) agreed to testing, of whom 588 (40.55%) had established HIV infection and 21 (1.45%) had acute infection. Discordant rapid antibody tests identified 7 of 21 (33.3% sensitivity), standard p24 antigen identified 12 of 16 (75% sensitivity), and ultrasensitive p24 antigen identified 15 of 17 (88% sensitivity) acute cases. By definition, the sensitivity of the RNA assay was 100%. Conclusions. Real-time pooled RNA testing for the detection of acute HIV infection is feasible in resource-limited settings. However, parallel rapid testing and p24 antigen testing are technologically simpler and together may detect similar to 90% of acute cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available