4.8 Article

Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 671-679

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.038

Keywords

dermal fibroblasts; cell mechanics; hydrogel stiffness; hyaluronan; fibronectin

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR47894, K01 AR047894] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R37 AG010143-23, R37 AG010143, AG010143] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To successfully induce tissue repair or regeneration in vivo, bioengineered constructs must possess both optimal bioactivity and mechanical strength. This is because cell interaction with the extracellular matrix (ECM) produces two different but concurrent signaling mechanisms: ligation-induced signaling, which depends on ECM biological stimuli, and traction-induced signaling, which depends on ECM mechanical stimuli. In this report, we provide a fundamental understanding of how alterations in mechanical stimuli alone, produced by varying the viscoelastic properties of our bioengineered construct, modulate phenotypic behavior at the whole-cell level. Using a physiologically relevant ECM mimic composed of hyaluronan and fibronectin, we found that adult human dermal fibroblasts modify their mechanical response in order to match substrate stiffness. More specifically, the cells on stiffer substrates had higher modulus and a more stretched and organized actin cytoskeleton (and vice versa), which translated into larger traction forces exerted on the substrate. This modulation of cellular mechanics had contrasting effects on migration and proliferation, where cells migrated faster on softer substrates while proliferating preferentially on the stiffer ones. These findings implicate substrate rigidity as a critical design parameter in the development of bioengineered constructs aimed at eliciting maximal cell and tissue function. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available