4.4 Article

Nano-structures in YSZ(100) surfaces:: Implications for metal deposition experiments

Journal

SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 601, Issue 3, Pages 792-802

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.11.007

Keywords

atomic force microscopy; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; etching; growth; nucleation; sintering; surface structure; morphology; roughness and topography; self-organized structures; palladium; YSZ(100); yttria stabilized zirconia; single crystal surfaces; surface defects; insulating surfaces; metal-insulator interfaces

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The surface morphology of yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ)(100) single crystals are examined by AFM and XPS before and after thermal annealing in air to 1000 degrees C. The surfaces show a large variability in topography which can be categorized in three types: (1) surfaces with well defined terraces, (2) surfaces with etch pits and no visible terraces, (3) surfaces with large square or rectangular holes with flat bottoms. All three types of surfaces show a large number of defects (pits, adatoms, steps) originating from the manufacturing process, and certain samples show large nano-structured arrays of self-organized lines at step edges. The evolution of the surfaces with time at 1000 degrees C and with higher temperatures was studied. Terraces are ultimately obtained for all sample types at 1300 degrees C, but the terrace shape is affected by the original defect structure. This history dependence is attributed to defect interactions modifying the annealing process. This is true even for UHV samples prepared using sputter-anneal cycles. The surface type is found to affect the nucleation, growth and sintering behaviour of palladium deposited by electron beam evaporation. For type 3 samples the metal nucleates at step edges outside the holes to particles 6 A in height, following heating to 135 degrees C the particles move inside the holes forming agglomerates up to 20 (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available