4.1 Article

Predictability of a large-scale flow conducive to extreme precipitation over the western Alps

Journal

METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS
Volume 95, Issue 3-4, Pages 123-138

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-006-0205-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quality of numerical weather prediction has improved considerably since its beginning. Over the last decade, in the North Hemisphere and more specifically over Europe, the accuracy of global numerical weather predictions of 500 hPa height has increased by one day. However this remarkable achievement has to be considered true for average conditions since it is computed over many days/seasons with very different flow patterns and atmospheric states. It is known that atmospheric predictability and model errors are highly flow-dependent therefore an increase in skill for average conditions may not imply the same improvements in specific conditions. Moreover the potential value of numerical weather prediction is perceived to be higher in some specific conditions, like high-impact weather events. There is therefore a growing need to know the forecasting accuracy of significant weather events, something that cannot be easily inferred through average scores, not least because of the rarity of these events. For these reasons, a study has been carried out to examine the skill of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) global forecasting system in predicting a specific flow configuration that is believed to be associated with extreme precipitation events over the Alpine region. Despite quantitative predictions of extreme precipitations is still challenging, it was found that the large-scale flow conducive to major rain events has better predictive skill than average conditions. This is perhaps surprising since it is a common perception to associate severe weather with low predictability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available