4.6 Article

Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic analyses of Androctonus australis hector venom in rats:: Optimization of antivenom therapy

Journal

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 218, Issue 3, Pages 205-214

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.11.003

Keywords

scorpion venom; antivenom therapy; toxicokinetics; toxicodynamics; antibody fragments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the simultaneous determination of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic properties of Androctonus australis hector venom, in the absence and presence of antivenom (F(ab')(2) and Fab), in envenomed rats. After subcutaneous injection of the venom, toxins showed a complete absorption phase from the site of injection associated with a distribution into a large extravascular compartment. The injection of Fab and F(ab)(2) induced the neutralization of venom antigens in the blood compartment, as well as the redistribution of venom components from the extravascular compartment to the blood compartment. Interestingly, F(ab')(2) and Fab showed distinct efficiencies depending on their route of injection. F(ab')(2) induced a faster venom neutralization and redistribution than Fab when injected intravenously. Fab was more effective than F(ab')(2) by the intramuscular route. The hemodynamic effects of Aah venom were further investigated. Changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate were observed in parallel with an upper airway obstruction. Fab was more effective than F(ab')(2) for preventing early symptoms of envenomation, whatever their route of administration. Intraperitoneal injection of F(ab)(2) and Fab was similar for the prevention of the delayed symptoms, even after a late administration. Fab was more effective than F(ab')(2) in the inhibition of airway resistance, independent of the route and time of administration. These results show that the treatment for scorpion stings might be improved by the intravascular injection of a mixture of Fab and F(ab')(2). If antivenom cannot be administered intravenously, Fab might be an alternative as they are more effective than F(ab')(2) when injected intramuscularly. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available