4.7 Article

Dietary abscisic acid ameliorates glucose tolerance and obesity-related inflammation in db/db mice fed high-fat diets

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 107-116

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.07.008

Keywords

type II diabetes; obesity; inflammation and PPAR gamma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Et Aims: Despite their efficacy in improving insulin sensitivity, thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are associated with a number of side effects (i.e. weight gain, hepatotoxicity, congestive heart failure) that have limited their use by millions of diabetic patients. We have investigated whether abscisic acid (ABA), a naturally occurring phytochemical with structural similarities to TZDs, could be used as an alternative to TZDs to improve glucose homeostasis. Methods: We first examined whether ABA, similar to TZDs' activates PPAR gamma in vitro. We next determined the lowest effective dose of dietary ABA (100 mg/kg) and assessed its effect on glucose tolerance, obesity-related inflammation, and mRNA expression of PPAR gamma and its responsive genes in white adipose tissue (WAT) of db/db mice fed high-fat diets. Results: We found that ABA induced transactivation of PPAR gamma in 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes in vitro. Dietary ABA-supplementation for 36 days decreased fasting blood glucose concentrations, ameliorated glucose tolerance, and increased mRNA expression of PPAR gamma and its responsive genes (i.e., adiponectin, aP2, and CD36) in WAT. We also found that adipocyte hypertrophy, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) expression, and macrophage infiltration in WAT were significantly attenuated in ABA-fed mice. Conclusions: These findings suggest that ABA could be used as a nutritional intervention against type II diabetes and obesity-related inflammation. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available