4.4 Review

In search of East Asian self-enhancement

Journal

PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 4-27

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1088868306294587

Keywords

culture/ethnicity; self-presentation; self/identity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A meta-analysis of published cross-cultural studies of self-enhancement reveals pervasive and pronounced differences between East Asians and Westerners. Across 91 comparisons, the average cross-cultural effect was d =.84. The effect emerged in all 30 methods, except for comparisons of implicit self-esteem. Within cultures, Westerners showed a clear self-serving bias (d =.87), whereas East Asians did not (d =.01), with Asian Americans falling in between (d =.52). East Asians did self-enhance in the methods that involved comparing themselves to average but were self-critical in other methods. It was hypothesized that this inconsistency could be explained in that these methods are compromised by the everyone is better than their group's average effect (EBTA). Supporting this rationale, studies that were implicated by the EBTA reported significantly larger self-enhancement effect for all cultures compared to other studies. Overall, the evidence converges to show that East Asians do not self-enhance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available