4.7 Article

The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 348-358

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040

Keywords

anorexia nervosa; binge eating disorder; bulimia nervosa; eating disorders; epidemiology; national comorbidity survey replication (NCS-R)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Little population-based data exist on the prevalence or correlates of eating disorders. Methods: Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders from the National Comorbidity Replication, a nationally representative face-to-face household survey (n = 9282), conducted in 2001-2003, were assessed using the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Results: Lifetime prevalence estimates of DSM-IV anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder are .9%, 1.5%, and 3.5% among women, and .3% .5%, and 2.0% among men. Survival analysis based on retrospective age-of-onset reports suggests that risk of bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder increased with successive birth cohorts. All 3 disorders are significantly comorbid with many other DSM-IV disorders. Lifetime anorexia nervosa is significantly associated with low current weight (body-mass index < 18.5), whereas lifetime binge eating disorder is associated with current severe obesity (body-mass index >= 40). Although most respondents with 12-month bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder report some role impairment (data unavailable for anorexia nervosa since no respondents met criteria for 12-month prevalence), only a minority of cases ever sought treatment. Conclusions: Eating disorders, although relatively uncommon, represent a public health concern because they are frequently associated with other psychopathology and role impairment, and are frequently under-treated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available