4.3 Article

Localization of ODAM, PCNA, and CK14 in regenerating junctional epithelium during orthodontic tooth movement in rats

Journal

ANGLE ORTHODONTIST
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 534-540

Publisher

E H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC
DOI: 10.2319/051613-378.1

Keywords

Orthodontic tooth movement; Junctional epithelium; ODAM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify the regenerating junctional epithelium (JE) during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Materials and Methods: Closed-coil springs were used to create a 20 g mesial force to the maxillary first molars. On days 1, 3, 7, 10, and 14 after force application, histologic changes in JE were examined by imnnunohistochemistry using proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein (ODAM), and cytokeratin 14 (CK14). Results: On day 1, JE was destroyed and lost attachment to the tooth surface. Cell division activity was rarely observed in JE, and ODAM localization was weakly detected in damaged JE. By day 3, regenerating JE had not fully recovered. High cell proliferation activity and CK14 expression started to appear in most basal cells of JE. ODAM expression was reduced and appeared in a small area. By day 7, JE had almost recovered. Cell proliferation activity was still observed in several basal cells of JE, and ODAM expression was detected among JE cells. CK14 was hardly observed in JE except in the basal cells. By days 10 and 14, regenerated JE appeared. ODAM, PCNA, and CK14 expression was similar to that of the control. Conclusions: Damaged JE might recover rapidly during orthodontic tooth movement because basal cells of the remaining JE, which show higher proliferation activity, are involved in JE regeneration. Reduced ODAM expression during proliferation of JE cells may increase again after JE regeneration is complete. Therefore, ODAM may be associated with the normal function of JE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available