4.3 Article

Surgical results in pediatric moyamoya disease: Angiographic revascularization and the clinical results

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 125-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.06.004

Keywords

bypass surgery; EDAMS; moyamoya disease; pediatric; surgical results

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objecive: We retrospectively reviewed the pediatric patients with moyamoya disease (MMD) who underwent bypass surgery at our institution to compare the surgical results according to the surgical procedures. Patients and methods: There were 24 total patients (age range: 2-15 years; mean age: 8.2 years). Twelve patients underwent encephalo-duroarterio-synangiosis (EDAS) on 16 sides, 5 patients underwent encephalo-duro-arterio-myo-synangiosis (EDAMS) on 8 sides and 7 patients underwent combined superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) anastomosis with EDAMS (STA-MCA-EDAMS) on 12 sides. The postoperative results were evaluated between 4 months and 5 years following surgery in terms of the angiographic revascularization and the clinical outcome. Results: EDAMS, regardless of the combined STA-MCA anastomosis, was significantly effective for achieving a good extent of the postoperative angiographic revascularization as compared with simple EDAS (P < 0.05). STA-MCA-EDAMS tended to be better with respective to the relief of preoperative ischemic symptoms as compared with simple EDAS, although there was no significant statistical difference. Conclusion: These results suggest that EDAMS with or without the combination of STA-MCA anastomosis was very useful for the formation of collateral circulation in comparison with simple EDAS for treating the pediatric patients with MMD, although these findings were not well correlated with the clinical outcomes. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available