4.7 Article

Test-retest study of fMRI signal change evoked by electroacupuncture stimulation

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 1171-1181

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.019

Keywords

fMRI; brain imaging electroacupuncture; acupuncture; test-retest reproducibility; reliability; vision-related point

Funding

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [K01AT003883, K01 AT003883, P01-AT002048, R21 AT001922, R21AT00949, R21 AT000949, P01 AT002048] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR001066, M01-RR-01066, P41 RR014075, P41RR14075] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent efforts to use fMRI to investigate the effects of acupuncture needle manipulation on the brain have yielded discrepant results. This study was designed to test the reliability of fMRI signal changes evoked by acupuncture stimulation. Six subjects participated in six identical scanning sessions consisting of four functional scans, one for each of the four conditions: electroacupuncture stimulation (2 Hz) at GB 37, UB 60, non-acupoint (NP), and a control task of the finger tapping. In the group analysis across all subjects and sessions, both the average ratings on a Subjective Acupuncture Sensation Scale and the average fMRI signal changes (increases and decreases) were similar for GB37, UB 60, and NP. Visual inspection of the activation maps from individual sessions and ICC analysis revealed that fMRI signal changes evoked by electroacupuncture stimulation were significantly more variable than those from the control finger-tapping task. The relatively large variability across different sessions within the same subject suggests multiple sessions should be used to accurately capture the activation patterns evoked by acupuncture stimulation at a particular point for a specific subject. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available