4.6 Article

Neighborhood environment and risk of ischemic stroke - The Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) Project

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 3, Pages 279-287

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwk005

Keywords

cerebrovascular accident; ethnic groups; residence characteristics; social class

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS38916, R01 NS038916] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors explored whether neighborhood-level characteristics are associated with ischemic stroke and whether the association differs by ethnicity, age, and gender. Using data from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project ( January 2000-June 2003), they identified cases of ischemic stroke (n = 1,247) from both hospital and out-of-hospital sources. Census tracts served as proxies for neighborhoods, and neighborhood socioeconomic status scores were constructed from census variables ( higher scores represented less disadvantage). In Poisson regression analyses comparing the 90th percentile of neighborhood score with the 10th, the relative risk of stroke was 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41, 0.58). After adjustment for age, gender, and ethnicity, this association was attenuated ( relative risk (RR) = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63, 1.00). There was no ethnic difference in the association of score with stroke ( p for interaction = 0.79). Significant effect modi. cation was found for age ( p for interaction < 0.001) and gender ( p for interaction = 0.04), with increasing scores being protective against stroke in men and younger persons. Associations were attenuated after adjustment for education ( men: RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.07; persons aged < 65 years: RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41, 1.02). Neighborhood characteristics may influence stroke risk in certain gender and age groups. Mechanisms for these associations should be examined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available