4.4 Article

Longitudinal evidence that psychopathy scores in early adolescence predict adult psychopathy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages 155-165

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC/EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.155

Keywords

adolescent psychopathy; Childhood Psychopathy Scale; chronic offending; longitudinal

Funding

  1. MRC [G0601483, G0100527] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0601483, G0100527] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0100527, G0601483] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [MH45070, MH49414, R01 MH060104-04, MH60104, R01 MH060104, R01 MH045070, R01 MH049414] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the relation between psychopathy assessed at age 13 by using the mother-reported Childhood Psychopathy Scale (D. R. Lynam, 1997) and psychopathy assessed at age 24 by using the interviewer-rated Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV; S. D. Hart, D. N. Cox, & R. D. Hare, 1995). Data from over 250 participants of the middle sample of the Pittsburgh Youth Study were used to examine this relation; approximately 9% of the sample met criteria for a possible PCL:SV diagnosis. Despite the long time lag, different sources, and different methods, psychopathy from early adolescence into young adulthood was moderately stable (r = .31). The relation was present for the PCL:SV total and facet scores, was not moderated by initial risk status or initial psychopathy level, and held even after controlling for other age 13 variables. Diagnostic stability was somewhat lower. Both specificity and negative predictive power were good, and sensitivity was adequate, but positive predictive power was poor. This constitutes the first demonstration of the relative stability of psychopathy from adolescence into adulthood and provides evidence for the incremental utility of the adolescent psychopathy construct. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available