4.6 Article

Theoretical evaluation of PAH dication properties

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 462, Issue 2, Pages 627-U225

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066053

Keywords

astrochemistry; molecular data; molecular processes; ISM : molecules; ultraviolet : ISM; infrared : ISM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. We present a systematic, theoretical study of 40 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon dications (PAHs(++)) containing up to 66 carbon atoms. Methods. We performed our calculations using well-established quantum-chemical techniques in the framework of (i) the density functional theory (DFT) to obtain the electronic ground-state properties and of (ii) the time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) to evaluate the excited-state properties. Results. For each PAH(++) considered, we computed the absolute visible-UV photo-absorption cross-section up to about 30 eV. We also evaluated their vibrational properties and compared them to those of the corresponding neutral and singly-ionised species. We estimated the adiabatic and vertical second ionisation energy. I through total energy differences. Conclusions. The. I values obtained fall in the energy range 8-13 eV, confirming that PAHs could reach the doubly-ionised state in HI regions. The total integrated IR absorption cross-sections show a marked increase upon ionisation, being on the average about two and five times larger for PAHs(++) than for PAHs(+) and PAHs, respectively. The visible-UV photo-absorption cross-sections for the 0, +1 and +2 charge-states show comparable features but PAHs++ are found to absorb slightly less than their parent neutral and singly ionised species between similar to 7 and similar to 12 eV. Combining these pieces of information, we found that PAHs(++) should actually be stabler against photodissociation than PAHs and PAHs(+), if dissociation thresholds are nearly unchanged by ionisation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available