4.7 Article

Effect of somatic cell count on Prato cheese composition

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 630-636

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71545-X

Keywords

somatic cell count; Prato cheese; proteolysis; ripening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of 2 levels of somatic cell counts (SCC) in raw milk on Prato cheese composition, protein and fat recovery, cheese yield, and ripening. A 2 x 6 factorial design with 3 replications was performed in this study: 2 levels of SCC and 6 levels of storage time. Initially, 2 groups of dairy cows were selected to obtain low (< 200,000 cells/mL) and high (> 600,000 cells/mL) SCC in milks that were used to manufacture 2 vats of cheese: 1) low SCC and 2) high SCC. Milk, whey, and cheese compositions were evaluated; clotting time was measured; and cheese yield, protein recovery, and fat recovery were calculated. The cheeses were evaluated after 5, 12, 19, 26, 33, and 40 d of ripening according to pH, moisture, pH 4.6 soluble nitrogen, 12% trichloroacetic acid soluble nitrogen as a percentage of total nitrogen, and firmness. High-SCC milk presented significantly higher total protein and nonprotein nitrogen and lower true protein and casein concentrations than did low-SCC milk, indicating an increased whey protein content and a higher level of proteolysis. Although the pH of the milk was not affected by the somatic cell level, the cheese obtained from high-SCC milk presented significantly higher pH values during manufacture and a higher clotting time. No significant differences in cheese yield and protein recovery were observed for these levels of milk somatic cells. The cheese from high-SCC milk was higher in moisture and had a higher level of proteolysis during ripening, which could compromise the typical sensory quality of the product.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available