4.6 Article

Effects of long-term zinc supplementation on plasma thiol metabolites and redox status in patients with age-related macular degeneration

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages 206-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.056

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY07892, R01 EY007892, P30 EY006360, P30 EY008126, EY08126, EY06360] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of zinc supplemen, tation on plasma thiol metabolites and their redox status in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial that evaluated the effects of high doses of zinc and antioxidants on plasma biomarkers of oxidative stress. METHODS: This was an ancillary study of the AgeRelated Eye Disease Study (AREDS). Subjects with AMD were randomized to one of four treatment groups: (1) antioxidants (vitamin C, 500 mg; vitamin E, 400 IU; and beta carotene, 15 mg), (2) zinc (80 mg zinc oxide, 2 mg cupric oxide), (3) antioxidants plus zinc, or (4) placebo. At 20 and 80 months after randomization, blood specimens were collected and analyzed for glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), cysteine (Cys), and cystine (CySS). RESULTS: Although zinc supplementation had no apparent effect on plasma thiol/disulfide redox status at the first blood draw, the group of patients receiving zinc supplementation at the second blood draw had significantly less CySS compared with those not receiving zinc (54.9 vs 64.1 mu M; P = .01). There was a time, dependent oxidation of the plasma GHS pool and was not affected by zinc supplementation. 0 CONCLUSIONS: Because increased CySS level is as, sociated with aging, oxidative stress, and age-related diseases, the apparent prevention of increased CySS by zinc supplementation warrants additional investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available