4.7 Article

Modelling the effects of tool-edge radius on residual stresses when orthogonal cutting AISI 316L

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.004

Keywords

finite element modelling; ALE; tool-edge radius; residual stresses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tool-edge geometry has significant effects on the cutting process, as it affects cutting forces, stresses, temperatures, deformation zone, and surface integrity. An Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (A.L.E.) finite element model is presented here to simulate the effects of cutting-edge radius on residual stresses (R.S.) when orthogonal dry cutting austenitic stainless steel AISI 316L with continuous chip formation. Four radii were simulated starting with a sharp edge, with a finite radius, and LIP to a value equal to the uncut chip thickness. Residual stress profiles started with surface tensile stresses then turned to be compressive at about 140 mu m from the surface; the same trend was found experimentally. Larger edge radius induced higher R.S. in both the tensile and compressive regions, while it had almost no effect on the thickness of tensile layer and pushed the maximum compressive stresses deeper into the workpiece. A stagnation zone was clearly observed when using non-sharp tools and its size increased with edge radius. The distance between the stagnation-zone tip and the machined surface increased with edge radius, which explained the increase in material plastic deformation, and compressive R.S. when using larger edge radius. Workpiece temperatures increased with edge radius; this is attributed to the increase in friction heat generation as the contact area between the tool edge and workpiece increases. Consequently, higher tensile R.S. were induced in the near-surface layer. The low thermal conductivity of AISI 316L restricted the effect of friction heat to the near-surface layer; therefore, the thickness of tensile layer was not affected. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available