4.5 Article

Physicians' comfort in caring for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 333, Issue 2, Pages 93-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/00000441-200702000-00005

Keywords

chronic nonmalignant pain; physician; education; training; comfort

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [1-D14-HP00169-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: More than 100 million U.S. adults experience chronic nonmalignant pain. Many physicians are uncomfortable managing such patients. We sought to determine the timing and intensity of training that primary care physicians receive in chronic pain treatment, and the effect of training on their comfort in managing patients. Methods: The 4P Study was a cross-sectional study conducted at 12 academic medical centers in the United States. More than 500 primary care physicians completed a survey regarding their attitudes toward patients with chronic nonmalignant pain and their education in chronic pain management. Results: We received 572 surveys out of 753 distributed. The respondents' mean age was 35 years; 64% were white, non-Hispanic and 41% were women. Eighty-eight percent were internists, and mean years spent in practice were 7.6. Fifty-seven percent of the physicians felt that they should serve as the principal doctor managing patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Only 34% of physicians felt comfortable in managing patients with chronic pain. More intensive education after entry into practice was associated with the highest comfort level. Conclusions: Most primary care physicians are not comfortable treating patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Education increases primary care physicians' comfort in managing these patients. Increased comfort was associated with the willingness of primary care physicians to take charge of managing chronic pain. In addition, physician comfort is greatest when pain management ski I Is are taught after residency training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available