Journal
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 331-342Publisher
CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/X06-236
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Thinning and prescribed fire are widely used to restore fire-suppressed forests, yet there are few studies of their effectiveness in Sierran mixed-conifer forest. We compared stand conditions in replicated plots before and after a combination of thinning and burning treatments against a reconstruction of the same forest in 1865. The historical forest had 67 stems/ha (trees >= 5 cm DBH), equal percentages of shade-tolerant and -intolerant tree species, stems randomly distributed at the stand scale, and a flat diameter distribution across size classes. The pretreatment forest averaged 469 stems/ha, which comprised 84% shade-tolerant and 14% shade-in tolerant species, were highly clustered, and had a reverse-J-shaped diameter distribution. Thinning treatments failed to approximate historical composition, spatial pattern, or diameter distribution. Treatments left too many small trees, removed too many intermediate-sized trees (50-75 cm DBH), and retained a reverse-J-shaped diameter distribution. Current old growth comprises fewer large trees than historical conditions, suggesting that treatments should retain more intermediate-sized trees to provide for future large-tree recruitment. Understory thinning with prescribed fire significantly reduced stern density and produced a spatial pattern closest to historical conditions. Mixed-conifer restoration needs thinning prescriptions that vary by species and flexible rather than rigid upper diameter limits to retain some trees in all size classes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available