4.6 Review

The psychosocial impact of parental cancer on children and adolescents: a systematic review

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 101-126

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1113

Keywords

children; breast cancer; family dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review aimed to identify (i) whether early stage parental cancer is associated with an increased risk of psychosocial difficulties amongst children and adolescents; (ii) which factors are associated with variations in psychosocial functioning amongst these children and adolescents. Searches of four electronic databases and the reference lists of relevant articles revealed 10 studies which satisfied the inclusion criteria for the first review question and thirteen studies for the second. Limitations in methodological quality and modest numbers of studies examining the same variables, restricted the conclusions which could be drawn. Overall, the evidence suggests that children and adolescents do not generally experience elevated levels of serious psychosocial difficulties compared to reference groups, but they are at a slightly increased risk for internalising type problems. Adolescent daughters appear to be the most negatively affected group. The prevalent use of measures of child psychopathology may be masking more context-specific problems and lower levels of distress. Family variables, especially family communication/expressiveness, are consistently associated with child/ adolescent psychosocial functioning and there is suggestive evidence for the role of maternal depression/ adjustment and parenting variables. There is little evidence that medical/treatment variables are important predictors of child outcomes. These findings have implications for identifying families with children most in need of support and indicating variables to target in interventions. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available