4.5 Article

Importance of geochemical transformations in determining submarine groundwater discharge-derived trace metal and nutrient fluxes

Journal

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 477-490

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.10.005

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seasonal (Spring and Summer 2002) concentrations of dissolved (< 0.22 mu m) trace metals (Ag, Al, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb), inorganic nutrients (NO3, PO4, Si), and DOC were determined in groundwater samples from 5 wells aligned along a 30 in shore-normal transect in West Neck Bay, Long Island, NY. Results show that significant, systematic changes in groundwater trace metal and nutrient composition occur along the flowpath from land to sea. While conservative mixing between West Neck Bay water and the groundwaters explains the behavior of Si and DOC, non -conservative inputs for Co and Ni were observed (concentration increases of 10- and 2-fold, respectively) and removal Of PO4 and NO3 (decreases to about half) along the transport pathway. Groundwater- associated chemical fluxes from the aquifer to the embayment calculated for constituents not exhibiting conservative behavior can vary by orders of magnitude depending on sampling location and season (e.g. Co, 3.4 x 10(2)-8.2 x 10(3) mu mol d(-1)). Using measured values from different wells as being representative of the true groundwater endmember chemical composition also results in calculation of very different fluxes (e.g., Cu, 6.3 x 10(3) mu mol d(-1) (inland, freshwater well) vs. 2.1 x 10(5) mu mol d(-1)(seaward well, S = 17 ppt)). This study suggests that seasonal variability and chemical changes occurring within the subterranean estuary must be taken into account when determining the groundwater flux of dissolved trace metals and nutrients to the coastal ocean. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available