4.8 Article

Digenic mutations account for variable phenotypes in idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 117, Issue 2, Pages 457-463

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI29884

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [U54 HD028138, P30 HD028138, HD028138, HD15788, R01 HD015788, P50 HD028138] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE13686, R01 DE013686] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

(GnRH) secretion and/or action is a developmental disorder of sexual maturation. To date, several single-gene defects have been implicated in the pathogenesis of IHH. However, significant inter- and intrafamilial variability and apparent incomplete penetrance in familial cases of IHH are difficult to reconcile with the model of a single-gene defect. We therefore hypothesized that mutations at different IHH loci interact in some families to modify their phenotypes. To address this issue, we studied 2 families, one with Kallmann syndrome (IHH and anosmia) and another with normosmic IHH, in which a single-gene defect had been identified: a heterozygous FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) mutation in pedigree 1 and a compound heterozygous gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GNRHR) mutation in pedigree 2, both of which varied markedly in expressivity within and across families. Further candidate gene screening revealed a second heterozygous deletion in the nasal embryonic LHRH factor (NELF) gene in pedigree 1 and an additional heterozygous FGFR1 mutation in pedigree 2 that accounted for the considerable phenotypic variability. Therefore, 2 different gene defects can synergize to produce a more severe phenotype in IHH families than either alone. This genetic model could account for some phenotypic heterogeneity seen in GnRH deficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available