4.6 Article

Galactic star formation rates gauged by stellar end-products

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 463, Issue 2, Pages 481-492

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054146

Keywords

galaxies : starburst; infrared : galaxies; radio continuum : galaxies; X-rays : binaries; X-rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Young galactic X-ray point sources (XPs) closely trace the ongoing star formation in galaxies. From measured XP number counts we extract the collective 2-10 keV luminosity of young XPs, L-x(yXP), which we use to gauge the current star formation rate (SFR) in galaxies. We find that, for a sample of local star-forming galaxies (i.e., normal spirals and mild starbursts), L-x(yXP) correlates linearly with the SFR over three decades in luminosity. A separate, high-SFR sample of starburst ULIRGs can be used to check the calibration of the relation. Using their ( presumably SF-related) total 2-10 keV luminosities we find that these sources satisfy the SFR-L-x(yXP) relation, as defined by the weaker sample, and extend it to span similar to 5 decades in luminosity. The SFR-L-x(yXP) relation is also likely to hold for distant (z similar to 1) Hubble Deep Field North galaxies, especially so if these high-SFR objects are similar to the ( more nearby) ULIRGs. It is argued that the SFR-L-x(yXP) relation provides the most adequate X-ray estimator of instantaneous SFR by the phenomena characterizing massive stars from their birth ( FIR emission from placental dust clouds) through their death as compact remnants (emitting X-rays by accreting from a close donor). For local, low/intermediate-SFR galaxies, the simultaneous existence of a correlation of the instantaneous SFR with the total 2-10 keV luminosity, L-x, which traces the SFR integrated over the last similar to 10(9) yr, suggests that during such epoch the SF in these galaxies has been proceeding at a relatively constant rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available