4.7 Article

Evidence of GLP-1-mediated neuroprotection in an animal model of pyridoxine-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 203, Issue 2, Pages 293-301

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.09.028

Keywords

GLP-1; exendin-4; behavior; diabetes; morphology; neuropathy; neuroprotection; neurotrophic; pyroxidine; rat; stereometry

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [Z01 AG000311-05] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pyridoxine (vitamin 136) intoxicated rodents develop a peripheral neuropathy characterized by sensory nerve conduction deficits associated disturbances of nerve fiber geometry and axonal atrophy. To investigate the possibility that glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)-amide (GLP-1) receptor agonism may influence axonal structure and function through neuroprotection neurotrophic support, effects of GLP-1 and its long acting analog, Exendin-4 (Ex4) treatment on pyridoxine-induced peripheral neuropathy were examined in rats using behavioral and morphometric techniques. GLP-1 is an endogenous insulinotropic peptide secreted from the gut in response to the presence of food. GLP-1 receptors (GLP-1) are coupled to the cAMP second messenger pathway, and are expressed widely throughout neural tissues of humans and rodents. Recent studies have established that GLP-1 and Ex4, have multiple synergistic effects on glucose-dependent insulin secretion pathways of pancreatic beta-cells and on neural plasticity. Data reported here suggest that clinically relevant doses of GLP-1 and Ex4 may offer some protection against the sensory peripheral neuropathy induced by pyridoxine. Our findings suggest a potential role for these peptides in the treatment of neuropathies, including that associated with type II diabetes mellitus. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available