4.2 Article

Oxytocin selectively increases ERα mRNA in the neonatal hypothalamus and hippocampus of female prairie voles

Journal

NEUROPEPTIDES
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 39-44

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.npep.2006.10.002

Keywords

oxytocin; estrogen receptor alpha; estrogen receptor beta; prairie vole; RT-PCR; hypothalamus; hippocampus

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD 48390] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 01992, K01 MH001992, K01 MH001992-05] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During neonatal development exogenous oxytocin increases ER alpha immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus of female prairie voles. The purpose of this study was to determine if the increase in ER alpha is associated with an increase in ERa mRNA expression and to determine if the effect is specific to ER subtype or if oxytocin also influences ER beta mRNA expression. On the day of birth female prairie vole pups were treated with oxytocin, an oxytocin antagonist, or saline. Brains were collected and RT-PCR was used to determine the effect of treatment on ER mRNA production in the hypothalamus, hippocampus, and cortex. Within 2 h of treatment oxytocin significantly increased ER alpha mRNA expression in the hypothalamus and hippocampus, but not the cortex, while inhibiting the effects of endogenous oxytocin reduced the expression of ER alpha mRNA in the hippocampus. Neonatal treatment did not affect the expression of ER beta mRNA. The results demonstrate that the effects of oxytocin treatment are region and ER subtype specific and that during the neonatal period oxytocin can affect the expression of ER alpha by altering message production. The regional specific changes in ER alpha mRNA expression in females are consistent with studies examining the behavioral and physiological effects of neonatal manipulation of oxytocin in females. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available