4.6 Article

TGFβ inducible early gene-1 (TIEG1) and cardiac hypertrophy:: Discovery and characterization of a novel signaling pathway

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 315-325

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.21049

Keywords

TIEG; cardial hypertrophy; PTTG-1

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [1K08HL073927-01, K08 HL073927, R01 HL085591] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE14036, R01 DE014036] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellular mechanisms causing cardiac hypertrophy are currently under intense investigation. We report a novel finding in the TGF beta inducible early gene (TIEG) null mouse implicating TIEG1 in cardiac hypertrophy. The TIEG(-/-) knock-out mouse was studied. Male mice age 4-16 months were characterized (N = 86 total) using echocardiography, transcript profiling by gene microarray, and immunohistochemistry localized upregulated genes for determination of cellular mechanism. The female mice (N = 40) did not develop hypertrophy or fibrosis. The TIEG(-/-) knock-out mouse developed features of cardiac hypertrophy including asymmetric septal hypertrophy, an increase in ventricular size at age 16 months, an increase (214%) in mouse heart/weight body weight ratio TIEG(-/-), and an increase in wall thickness in TIEG(-/-) mice of (1.85 +/- 0.21 mm), compared to the control (1.13 +/- 0.15 mm, P < 0.04). Masson Trichrome staining demonstrated evidence of myocyte disarray and rnyofibroblast fibrosis. Microarray analysis of the left ventricles demonstrated that TIEG(-/-) heart tissues expressed a 13.81-fold increase in pituitary turnor-transforming gene-1 (Pttg1). An increase in Pttg1 and histone H3 protein levels were confirmed in the TIEG(-/-) mice hearts tissues. We present evidence implicating TIEG and possibly its target gene, Pttg1, in the development of cardiac hypertrophy in the TIEG null mouse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available