4.7 Article

Design of tissue-specific regulatory cassettes for high-level rAAV-mediated expression in skeletal and cardiac muscle

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 320-329

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R24 HL64387] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR18860] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [1 U54 HD047175, T32 HD007183] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systemic delivery of recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) 6 vectors mediates efficient transduction of the entire striated musculature, making this an attractive strategy for muscle gene therapy. However, owing to widespread transduction of non-muscle tissues, optimization of this method would benefit from the use of muscle-specific promoters. Most such promoters either lack high-level expression in certain muscle types or are too large for inclusion in rAAV vectors encoding microdystrophin. Here, we describe novel regulatory cassettes based on enhancer/promoter regions of murine muscle creatine kinase (CK) and alpha-myosin heavy-chain genes. The strongest cassette, MHCK7 ( 770 bp), directs high-level expression comparable to cytomegalovirus and Rous sarcoma virus promoters in fast and slow skeletal and cardiac muscle, and low expression in the liver, lung, and spleen following systemic rAAV6 delivery in mice. Compared with CK6, our previous best cassette, MHCK7 activity is similar to 400-, similar to 50-, and similar to 10-fold higher in cardiac, diaphragm, and soleus muscles, respectively. MHCK7 also directs strong microdystrophin expression in mdx muscles. While further study of immune responses to MHCK7-regulated microdystrophin expression is needed, this cassette is not active in dendritic cell lines. MHCK7 is thus a highly improved regulatory cassette for experimental studies of rAAV-mediated transduction of striated muscle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available