4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Interaction of NPY compounds with the rat glucocorticoid-induced receptor (GIR) reveals similarity to the NPY-Y2 receptor

Journal

PEPTIDES
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 302-309

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.11.013

Keywords

glucocorticoid-induced receptor (GIR); NPY; Y-2 receptor; NPY3-36

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [U01 HD037249, U01 HD37249] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 53548, R01 DK053548] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS039087, R01 NS39087] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rat glucocorticoid-induced receptor (rGIR) is an orphan G protein-coupled receptor awaiting pharmacological characterization. Among known receptors, rGIR exhibits highest sequence similarity to the neuropeptide Y (NPY)-Y-2 receptor (38-40%). The pharmacological profile of rGIR was investigated using I-125-PYY3-36, a Y-2-preferring radioligand and several NPY analogs. rGIR displayed a similar displacement profile as reported for the Y-2 receptor, in that the Y-2-selective C terminus fragments of NPY and PYY (NPY3-36, and PYY3-36) showed high affinity binding and activation of rGIR (low nanomolar range). The rank order potency for displacement was NPY3-36 > PYY3-36=NPY > NPY13-36 > Ac, Leu NPY24-36 >[D-Trp(32)]-NPY > Leu(31), Pro(34)-NPY=hPP. NPY and Y-2-selective agonists NPY3-36 and PYY3-36 led to significant activation of S-35-GTP gamma S binding to rGIR transfected cells. BIIE0246, a specific Y-2 antagonist, displaced I-125-PYY3-36 binding to rGIR with high affinity (95 nM). Activation of S-35-GTP gamma S binding by Y-2-selective agonist in rGIR transfected cells was also completely abolished by BIIE0246. Our data report, for the first time, an interaction of NPY ligands with rGIR expressed in vitro, and indicate similarities between GIR and the NPY-Y-2 receptor. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available