4.5 Article

Isolation of antifouling compounds from the marine bacterium, Shewanella oneidensis SCH0402

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 243-249

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-006-9220-7

Keywords

antifouling; cis-9-oleic acid; 2-hydroxy myristic acid; negative chemotaxis; spore attachment; Shewanella oneidensis SCH0402

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two compounds, 2-hydroxymyristic acid (HMA) and cis-9-oleic acid (COA), were isolated from a chloroform extract of the marine bacterium, Shewanella oneidensis SCH0402. In a spectrophotometer-based chemotaxis assay, HMA completely eliminated the optical density (OD) of Alteromonas marina SCH0401 and Bacillus atrophaeus SCH0408, motile, fouling bacteria, at 100 and 1000 mu g ml(-1), respectively. COA similarly decreased the OD of A. marina and B. atrophaeus by 100% at 1000 mu g ml(-1). The commercially available, highly toxic anti-fouling compound, tributyltin oxide (TBTO) never reduced the OD of the target bacteria by 100% even at higher concentration. Instead, all the test bacterial cells were killed at higher than 1000 mu g ml(-1) of concentration. Both HMA and COA inhibited germination of Ulva pertusa spores completely at 10 and 100 mu g ml(-1), respectively, while TBTO inhibited germination at 0.01 mu g ml(-1). However, in field assays, both HMA and COA showed anti-fouling activities as potent as TBTO against a wide range of fouling organisms, including micro- and macro-algae, barnacles, and mussels. The average fouling coverage on the surface of the control panel was 93 +/- 6% after 1.5 years but no fouling was observed on the surface of the test panel onto which each compound was applied separately. Thus, bacterial repellent compounds can be used as substitutes for potent toxic anti-fouling compounds, resulting in higher standards of environmental safety without loss of anti-fouling performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available