4.8 Review

Solvent-Assisted Linker Exchange: An Alternative to the De Novo Synthesis of Unattainable Metal-Organic Frameworks

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 53, Issue 18, Pages 4530-4540

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201306923

Keywords

metal-organic frameworks; porous materials; SALE; solid-state structures

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG2-08ER15967]
  2. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-10-1-0023, HDTRA1-09-1-0007]
  3. ANSER Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001059]
  4. DOE Nanoporous Materials Genome Center
  5. Foundation for Polish Science through the Kolumb Program
  6. DOE EERE Postdoctoral Research Award (EERE Fuel Cell Technologies Program, DOE) [DE-AC05-060R23100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have gained considerable attention as hybrid materialsin part because of a multitude of potential useful applications, ranging from gas separation to catalysis and light harvesting. Unfortunately, denovo synthesis of MOFs with desirable function-property combinations is not always reliable and may suffer from vagaries such as formation of undesirable topologies, low solubility of precursors, and loss of functionality of the sensitive network components. The recently discovered synthetic approach coined solvent-assisted linker exchange (SALE) constitutes a simple to implement strategy for circumventing these setbacks; its use has already led to the generation of a variety of MOF materials previously unobtainable by direct synthesis methods. This Review provides a perspective of the achievements in MOF research that have been made possible with SALE and examines the studies that have facilitated the understanding and broadened the scope of use of this invaluable synthetic tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available