4.7 Review

Dietary polyphenolic phytochemicals - Promising cancer chemopreventive agents in humans? A review of their clinical properties

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 120, Issue 3, Pages 451-458

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22419

Keywords

cancer chemoprevention; clinical trial; curcumin; flavonoids; tea polyphenols

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiological and preclinical evidence suggests that polyphenolic phytochemicals exemplified by epigallocatechin gallate from tea, curcumin from curry and soya isoflavones possess cancer chemopreventive properties. Whilst such naturally occurring polyphenols have been the subject of numerous mechanistic studies in cells, information on their clinical properties, which might help assess their promise as human cancer chemopreventive agents, is scarce. Therefore, we present a review of pilot studies and trials with a cancer chemoprevention-related rationale, in which either healthy individuals or patients with premalignant conditions or cancer received polyphenolic phytochemicals. The review identifies trial design elements specifically applicable to polyphenolic phytochemicals. The available evidence for tea polyphenols tentatively supports their advancement into phase III clinical intervention trials aimed at the prevention of progression of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia, leukoplakia or premalignant cervical disease. In the case or curcumin and soya isoflavones more studies in premalignacies seem appropriate to optimise the nature and design of suitable phase III trials. The abundance of Havonoids and related polyphenols in the plant kingdom makes it possible that several hitfierto uncharacterised agents with chemopreventive efficacy are still to be identified, which may constitute attractive alternatives to currently used chemopreventive drugs. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available