4.3 Article

Impact of blood pressure variability on cardiac and cerebrovascular complications in hypertension

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 154-161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.07.017

Keywords

arterial hypertension; blood pressure variability; pulse pressure; hypertrophy; prognosis; blood pressure monitoring; epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The independent prognostic value of daytime and night-time blood pressure (BP) variability estimated by noninvasive 24-h BP monitoring is unclear. Methods: We followed 2649 initially untreated subjects with essential hypertension for up to 16 years (mean, 6). Variability of BP was estimated by the standard deviation of daytime or night-time systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). A BP variability either less than or equal to the group median or greater than the group median (12.7/1.4 mm Hg for daytime SBP/DBP and 10.8 and 8.9 mm Hg for night-time SBP/DBP) identified subjects at low or high BP variability. Results: During follow-up there were 167 new cardiac and 122 new cerebrovascular events. The rate of cardiac events (X 100 person-years) was higher (all P < .05) in the subjects with high than in those with low BP variability (daytime SBP: 1.45 v 0.72, daytime DBP: 1.29 v 0.91; night-time SBP: 1.58 v 0.62; night-time DBP: 1.32 v 0.85). The rate of cerebrovascular events was also higher (all P < .05) in the subjects with high than in those with low BP variability. In a multivariate analysis, after adjustment for several confounders, a high night-time SBP variability was associated with a 51% (P = .024) excess risk of cardiac events. The relation of daytime BP variability to cardiac events and that of daytime and night-time BP variability to cerebrovascular events lost significance in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: An enhanced variability in SBP during the night-time is an independent predictor of cardiac events in initially untreated hypertensive subjects. Am J Hypertens 2007;20:154-161 (c) 2007 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available