4.7 Article

Characterization of natural variation for zinc, iron and manganese accumulation and zinc exposure response in Brassica rapa L.

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 291, Issue 1-2, Pages 167-180

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-006-9184-2

Keywords

Brassica rapa L.; mineral accumulation; Zn excess tolerance; Zn efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brassica rapa L. is an important vegetable crop in eastern Asia. The objective of this study was to investigate the genetic variation in leaf Zn, Fe and Mn accumulation, Zn toxicity tolerance and Zn efficiency in B. rapa. In total 188 accessions were screened for their Zn-related characteristics in hydroponic culture. In experiment 1, mineral assays on 111 accessions grown under sufficient Zn supply (2 mu M ZnSO4) revealed a variation range of 23.2-155.9 mu g g(-1) dry weight (d. wt.) for Zn, 60.3-350.1 mu g g(-1) d. wt. for Fe and 20.9-53.3 mu g g(-1) d. wt. for the Mn concentration in shoot. The investigation of tolerance to excessive Zn (800 mu M ZnSO4) on 158 accessions, by using visual toxicity symptom parameters (TSPs), identified different levels of tolerance in B. rapa. In experiment 2, a selected sub-set of accessions from experiment 1 was characterized in more detail for their mineral accumulation and tolerance to excessive Zn supply (100 mu M and 300 mu M ZnSO4). In this experiment Zn tolerance (ZT) determined by relative root or shoot dry biomass varied about 2-fold. The same six accessions were also examined for Zn efficiency, determined as relative growth under 0 mu M ZnSO4 compared to 2 mu M ZnSO4. Zn efficiency varied 1.8-fold based on shoot dry biomass and 2.6-fold variation based on root dry biomass. Zn accumulation was strongly correlated with Mn and Fe accumulation both under sufficient and deficient Zn supply. In conclusion, there is substantial variation for Zn accumulation, Zn toxicity tolerance and Zn efficiency in Brassica rapa L., which would allow selective breeding for these traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available